blob: e2bb8dfa361f9a86ae2729cc2acefd14845b7308 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
From 2d74e7035bd060d662f1c4f8522377be8021be92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 16:59:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 30/89] x86/shadow: fix PAE check for top-level table
unshadowing
Clearly within the for_each_vcpu() the vCPU of this loop is meant, not
the (loop invariant) one the fault occurred on.
Fixes: 3d5e6a3ff383 ("x86 hvm: implement HVMOP_pagetable_dying")
Fixes: ef3b0d8d2c39 ("x86/shadow: shadow_table[] needs only one entry for PV-only configs")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
master commit: f8fdceefbb1193ec81667eb40b83bc525cb71204
master date: 2023-01-20 09:23:42 +0100
---
xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
index 2370b30602..671bf8c228 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
@@ -2672,10 +2672,10 @@ static int cf_check sh_page_fault(
#if GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS == 3
unsigned int i;
- for_each_shadow_table(v, i)
+ for_each_shadow_table(tmp, i)
{
mfn_t smfn = pagetable_get_mfn(
- v->arch.paging.shadow.shadow_table[i]);
+ tmp->arch.paging.shadow.shadow_table[i]);
if ( mfn_valid(smfn) && (mfn_x(smfn) != 0) )
{
--
2.40.0
|
GitWeb
